<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Principal vs. Prepaying, Our Debt Snowball and How Wachovia Stole $8.03</title> <atom:link href="http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/</link> <description>Personal Finance for Geeks from the Debt Snowball to Homemade Air Conditioners</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Software Wizard</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1910</link> <dc:creator>Software Wizard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:32:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1910</guid> <description>The way it&#039;s supposed to work is that the interest is calculated daily (probably) or monthly on the remaining amount.  Then, if you make a payment ahead, the remaining amount will be lowered so the interest owed would be lowered.  Once the loan is paid off, you are due a rebate check for the early payments.  This happened to me with a car loan I paid off about 7 years ago.   I haven&#039;t had a loan lately, so maybe banks are trickier now than I remember.
If this is the case, it&#039;s to your advantage that they count the money towards the next payment.  Otherwise, you could make a payment too early and be hit with a &quot;missed payment&quot; fee.  I just read a story on the web where a guy paid his credit card one day too early while carrying a balance.  They counted it towards the principle, but not to the upcoming payment cycle.  This caused him to &quot;miss&quot; a payment and be hit up with outrageous fees.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way it&#8217;s supposed to work is that the interest is calculated daily (probably) or monthly on the remaining amount.  Then, if you make a payment ahead, the remaining amount will be lowered so the interest owed would be lowered.  Once the loan is paid off, you are due a rebate check for the early payments.  This happened to me with a car loan I paid off about 7 years ago.   I haven&#8217;t had a loan lately, so maybe banks are trickier now than I remember.</p><p>If this is the case, it&#8217;s to your advantage that they count the money towards the next payment.  Otherwise, you could make a payment too early and be hit with a &#8220;missed payment&#8221; fee.  I just read a story on the web where a guy paid his credit card one day too early while carrying a balance.  They counted it towards the principle, but not to the upcoming payment cycle.  This caused him to &#8220;miss&#8221; a payment and be hit up with outrageous fees.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: paul</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1501</link> <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:57:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1501</guid> <description>Yeah and to add insult to injury my mortgages (yes plural) are with Wells Fargo.  Awesome.  Thanks for dropping by!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah and to add insult to injury my mortgages (yes plural) are with Wells Fargo.  Awesome.  Thanks for dropping by!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Financial Samurai</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1500</link> <dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:59:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1500</guid> <description>Gosh,, stuff like this ticks me off.  What&#039;s worse, Wachovia is Wells Fargo now, and Wells Fargo is shady, especially with their mortgage rates, and what Cheronda Guyton do with that foreclosed Malibu house!
.-= Financial Samurai´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinancialSamurai/~3/SWr-i57iwDg/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;We&#039;re Ignorant Idiots!  Please Tell Us Why A Flat Tax Is Not Fair.&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh,, stuff like this ticks me off.  What&#8217;s worse, Wachovia is Wells Fargo now, and Wells Fargo is shady, especially with their mortgage rates, and what Cheronda Guyton do with that foreclosed Malibu house!<br
/> .-= Financial Samurai´s last blog ..<a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinancialSamurai/~3/SWr-i57iwDg/" rel="nofollow">We&#8217;re Ignorant Idiots!  Please Tell Us Why A Flat Tax Is Not Fair.</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Credit Card Chaser</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1485</link> <dc:creator>Credit Card Chaser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:49:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1485</guid> <description>Congrats on your progress! My mortgage is through Sun Trust and they have a checkmark option on their online e-pay for any additional amount that I want to through directly towards the principal so I am very please with them.
.-= Credit Card Chaser´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.creditcardchaser.com/wells-fargo-expected-to-raise-credit-card-interest-rates-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wells Fargo Expected to Raise Credit Card Interest Rates 3%&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on your progress! My mortgage is through Sun Trust and they have a checkmark option on their online e-pay for any additional amount that I want to through directly towards the principal so I am very please with them.<br
/> .-= Credit Card Chaser´s last blog ..<a
href="http://www.creditcardchaser.com/wells-fargo-expected-to-raise-credit-card-interest-rates-3/" rel="nofollow">Wells Fargo Expected to Raise Credit Card Interest Rates 3%</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JoeTaxpayer</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1468</link> <dc:creator>JoeTaxpayer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1468</guid> <description>Paul,
Bad system, agreed. For mortgages, this is even more important as the dollars can add up fast. If one pays their mortgage by check, and is taking an extended vacation, they may want to make the payments ahead. If they are clustering their deductions to get higher Sch A itemized deduction in a given year, paying early can help. But of course, if they are trying to make principal payments and the bank isn&#039;t accounting properly, it make take some time before the customer realizes something is wrong.
You&#039;d think this concept would be easy for the banks to grasp, but i agree, they have no motivation to do so. When they make a mistake, they should pay you a penalty, just like we pay them for our mistakes.
Joe</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br
/> Bad system, agreed. For mortgages, this is even more important as the dollars can add up fast. If one pays their mortgage by check, and is taking an extended vacation, they may want to make the payments ahead. If they are clustering their deductions to get higher Sch A itemized deduction in a given year, paying early can help. But of course, if they are trying to make principal payments and the bank isn&#8217;t accounting properly, it make take some time before the customer realizes something is wrong.<br
/> You&#8217;d think this concept would be easy for the banks to grasp, but i agree, they have no motivation to do so. When they make a mistake, they should pay you a penalty, just like we pay them for our mistakes.<br
/> Joe</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: paul</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1466</link> <dc:creator>paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:31:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1466</guid> <description>That&#039;s great advice Jack I&#039;ll do just that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great advice Jack I&#8217;ll do just that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack Foley</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1465</link> <dc:creator>Jack Foley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1465</guid> <description>Pull out the original loan agreement.  Look up what the loan agreement says about payments in excess of your regularly scheduled payment.  Most agreements are written putting these excess payments on principal of note.
The organization is obligated to follow their contractual agreement with you regardless of any policies, procedures and systems they may have in place that causes them not to follow the terms of the contract.
Check it out.  If they aren&#039;t following the terms of the agreement, send them a copy of the agreement and get them to do it right.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pull out the original loan agreement.  Look up what the loan agreement says about payments in excess of your regularly scheduled payment.  Most agreements are written putting these excess payments on principal of note.</p><p>The organization is obligated to follow their contractual agreement with you regardless of any policies, procedures and systems they may have in place that causes them not to follow the terms of the contract.</p><p>Check it out.  If they aren&#8217;t following the terms of the agreement, send them a copy of the agreement and get them to do it right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kosmo @ The Casual Observer</title><link>http://www.fiscalgeek.com/2009/10/principle-vs-prepaying-and-our-debt-snowball/#comment-1462</link> <dc:creator>Kosmo @ The Casual Observer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.fiscalgeek.com/?p=1031#comment-1462</guid> <description>When we had our mortgage with CountryWide, we had extreme difficulty getting them to grasp the concept of an extra principal payment.  It eventually got straightened out, but it too way to much effort and involved way too many people.
We ran quickly away from CountryWide when we refi&#039;d (particulary since they were taken over by Bank of America, where we had an unpleasant experience).  We&#039;re with Chase now, and everything actually works like it should and gets applied properly.
There&#039;s really no excuse for not having a &quot;principal only&quot; option for an online payment.  In the grand scheme of things, it doesn&#039;t take that much more development time.  I&#039;m an IT guy, so I realize that this is a 5 minute coding change, but it&#039;s relatively small considering how important the payment receiving system is to the organization.
.-= Kosmo @ The Casual Observer´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCasualObserver/~3/dPKiRPY-krI/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eight Burning Questions About the Playoff Teams&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we had our mortgage with CountryWide, we had extreme difficulty getting them to grasp the concept of an extra principal payment.  It eventually got straightened out, but it too way to much effort and involved way too many people.</p><p>We ran quickly away from CountryWide when we refi&#8217;d (particulary since they were taken over by Bank of America, where we had an unpleasant experience).  We&#8217;re with Chase now, and everything actually works like it should and gets applied properly.</p><p>There&#8217;s really no excuse for not having a &#8220;principal only&#8221; option for an online payment.  In the grand scheme of things, it doesn&#8217;t take that much more development time.  I&#8217;m an IT guy, so I realize that this is a 5 minute coding change, but it&#8217;s relatively small considering how important the payment receiving system is to the organization.<br
/> .-= Kosmo @ The Casual Observer´s last blog ..<a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCasualObserver/~3/dPKiRPY-krI/" rel="nofollow">Eight Burning Questions About the Playoff Teams</a> =-.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
